Identifying and prioritising barriers to injury care in Northern Malawi, results of a multifacility multidisciplinary health facility staff survey

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 12;19(9):e0308525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308525. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: The burden of injuries globally and in Malawi is substantial. Optimising both access to, and quality of, care in health systems requires attention. We aimed to establish how health facility staff in Karonga, Malawi, perceive barriers to seeking (delay 1), reaching (delay 2) and receiving (delay 3) injury care.

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of health facility staff who treat patients with injuries in all health facilities serving the Karonga Demographic Surveillance Site population. The primary outcome was participant perceptions of the importance of delays 1 to 3 following injury. Secondary outcomes were the barriers within each of these delays considered most important and which were considered the most important across all delays stages.

Results: 228 staff completed the survey: 36.8% (84/228) were female and 61.4% (140/228) reported being involved in caring for an injured person at least weekly. Delay 3 was most frequently considered the most important delay 35.1% (80/228), with 19.3% (44/228) and 16.6% (38/228) reporting delays 1 and 2 as the most important respectively; 28.9% (66/228) of respondents either did not know or answer. For delay 1 the barrier, "the perceived financial costs associated with seeking care are too great", was considered most important. For delay 2, the barrier "lack of timely affordable emergency transport (formal or informal)" was considered most important. For delay 3, the barrier, "lack of reliably available necessary physical resources (infrastructure, equipment and consumable material)" was considered most important. When considering the most important overall barrier across all delays, the delay 3 barrier, "lack of reliably available necessary physical resources" received the most nominations (41.7% [95/228]).

Conclusions: Given the awareness of health facility staff of the issues facing their patients, these findings should assist in informing health system planning.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Health Facilities*
  • Health Personnel* / psychology
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Humans
  • Malawi
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Wounds and Injuries* / epidemiology
  • Wounds and Injuries* / therapy

Grants and funding

“This work was supported by a research fellowship awarded to JW from the Royal College of Surgeons of England and The King’s Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript”.