Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP

Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7552-7562. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11228-5. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

Abstract

Introduction: Given the increasing interest for surgeons to reclaim the common bile duct in managing choledocholithiasis, there is a growing movement to perform common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Advantages of concomitant CBDE with cholecystectomy include fewer anesthetic events and decreased length of stay. As there is a paucity of literature evaluating the use of the robotic platform for CBDE, our study aims to compare intraoperative and post-operative outcomes between robotic-assisted one-stage and two-stage management of choledocholithiasis.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed from May 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023, identifying patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy and transcystic CBDE with choledochoscopy (one-stage management). Preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative variables were compared to a control group of subjects with choledocholithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with pre- or post-operative ERCP (two-stage management). Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, Student's T, or Mann-Whitney test.

Results: Fifty-three subjects who underwent one-stage management and 101 subjects who underwent two-stage management met inclusion criteria. Groups had similar demographics and medical history. Time to CBD clearance (45.2 h vs 47.0 h, p = .036), total length of stay (3.9 days vs 5.1 days, p = .007), fluoroscopy time (70.3 s vs 151.4 s, p < .001), and estimated radiation dose (23.0 mSv vs 40.3 mSv, p = .002) were significantly lower in the one-stage group compared to two-stage. Clearance rates, complication rates, and 30-day readmission rates were similar for both groups. Total length of stay and radiation exposure remained significantly lower on subanalysis comparing one-stage management to two-stage management with ERCP either before or after cholecystectomy.

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy with transcystic common bile duct exploration via choledochoscopy is a safe and feasible option in the management of choledocholithiasis. It offers a shorter time to duct clearance, shorter length of stay, and less radiation exposure when compared to two-stage management.

Keywords: CBDE; Choledocholithiasis; Choledochoscopy; ERCP; Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Robotic surgery; Transcystic common bile duct exploration.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde* / methods
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic* / methods
  • Choledocholithiasis* / diagnostic imaging
  • Choledocholithiasis* / surgery
  • Common Bile Duct* / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures* / methods
  • Treatment Outcome