Objectives: Morning influenza vaccination enhances antibody response. In this post hoc analysis of the DANFLU-1 trial, we sought to evaluate the association between time of day for vaccination (ToV) and outcomes and whether ToV modified the relative effectiveness of high-dose (QIV-HD) vs. standard-dose (QIV-SD) quadrivalent influenza vaccine.
Methods: DANFLU-1 was a pragmatic feasibility trial of QIV-HD vs. QIV-SD. Outcomes included hospitalizations and mortality. For subgroup analysis, the population was dichotomized at median ToV into two groups (early and late).
Results: The study population included 12,477 participants. Mean age was 71.7 ± 3.9 years with 5877 (47.1%) female participants. Median ToV was 11.29 AM. Earlier ToV was associated with fewer respiratory hospitalizations independent of vaccine type, which persisted in adjusted analysis (IRR 0.88 per 1-hour decrement (95% CI 0.78- 0.98, p = 0.025). No effect modification by continuous or dichotomous ToV was found. In subgroup analysis, effects consistently favored QIV-HD against hospitalizations for pneumonia or influenza (early: IRR 0.30; late: 0.29), all-cause hospitalizations (early: IRR 0.87; late: 0.86), and mortality (early: HR 0.53; late: 0.50).
Conclusion: In this exploratory post hoc analysis, earlier ToV was associated with fewer respiratory hospitalizations. The relative effectiveness of QIV-HD vs. QIV-SD was not modified by ToV. Further research is needed to confirm findings.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05048589.
Keywords: Health care; Human; Influenza; Outcome assessment; Pragmatic clinical trial; Vaccination.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.