Hemp regulates the fitness of corn earworm (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) and its tachinid (Diptera) parasitoids

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 30;19(9):e0311220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311220. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Pest management on hemp is still in its infancy, and biological control options are limited. Helicoverpa zea (corn earworm) is one of the key pests of hemp cultivated outdoors, especially on cultivars grown for cannabinoids and grain. In a three-year study, we assessed the effect of diet on the performance of H. zea and its tachinid parasitoids. Parasitized (bearing fly eggs) and unparasitized (without eggs) H. zea larvae were fed on hemp flowers or an artificial diet. Five tachinid species parasitized H. zea larvae, but the most abundant species were Winthemia rufopicta (68.8%) and Lespesia aletiae (28.3%). Overall, 55.2% of H. zea larvae bearing tachinid eggs died, while the mortality of unparasitized larvae reached 24.7%. The success of tachinids increased by 2-fold when the host larvae were fed on an artificial diet. Our results demonstrated that high protein food (artificial diet), intensity of parasitism, and caterpillar size play a role in the fitness of both the herbivores (H. zea) and its tachinid parasitoids. These findings have important implications for understanding biological control mechanisms and open new insights into the impact of landscape variation on plant-herbivore-parasitoid interactions. This study contains supporting evidence that makes both Winthemia rufopicta and Lespesia aletiae excellent candidates for biological control programs against H. zea, a key pest of hemp in the United States.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cannabis* / parasitology
  • Diptera* / growth & development
  • Diptera* / physiology
  • Host-Parasite Interactions
  • Larva* / parasitology
  • Lepidoptera / parasitology
  • Lepidoptera / physiology
  • Moths / growth & development
  • Moths / parasitology
  • Pest Control, Biological / methods

Grants and funding

Funds to conduct these studies were provided by the USDA-ARS award N° 58-5042-1-003. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.