Artificial intelligence-based digital pathology for the detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths eggs

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Sep 30;18(9):e0012492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012492. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Conventional microscopy of Kato-Katz (KK1.0) thick smears, the primary method for diagnosing soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections, has limited sensitivity and is error-prone. Artificial intelligence-based digital pathology (AI-DP) may overcome the constraints of traditional microscopy-based diagnostics. This study in Ucayali, a remote Amazonian region of Peru, compares the performance of AI-DP-based Kato-Katz (KK2.0) method to KK1.0 at diagnosing STH infections in school-aged children (SAC).

Methods: In this prospective, non-interventional study, 510 stool samples from SAC (aged 5-14 years) were analyzed using KK1.0, KK2.0, and tube spontaneous sedimentation technique (TSET). KK1.0 and KK2.0 slides were evaluated at 30-minute and 24-hour timepoints for detection of Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, and hookworms (at 30-minute only). Diagnostic performance was assessed by measuring STH eggs per gram of stool (EPG), sensitivity of methods, and agreement between the methods.

Results: KK2.0 detected more A. lumbricoides positive samples than KK1.0, with detection rates for T. trichiura and hookworms being comparable. At 30-minutes, 37.6%, 23.0%, and 2.6% of the samples tested positive based on KK1.0 for A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and hookworms, while this was 49.8%, 24.4%, and 1.9% for KK2.0. At 24-hours, 37.1% and 27.1% of the samples tested positive based on KK1.0 for A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura, while this was 45.8% and 24.1% for KK2.0. Mean EPG between KK2.0 and KK1.0 were not statistically different across STH species and timepoints, except for T. trichiura at 24-hours (higher mean EPG for KK1.0, p = 0.036). When considering infection intensity levels, KK2.0 identified 10% more of the total population as low-infection intensity samples of A. lumbricoides than KK1.0 (p ≤ 0.001, both timepoints) and similar to KK1.0 for T. trichiura and hookworms. Varying agreement existed between KK1.0 and KK2.0 in detecting STH eggs (A. lumbricoides: moderate; T. trichiura: substantial; hookworms: slight). However, these findings should be interpreted carefully as there are certain limitations that may have impacted the results of this study.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of the AI-DP-based method for STH diagnosis. While similar to KK1.0, the AI-DP-based method outperforms it in certain aspects. These findings underscore the potential of advancing the AI-DP KK2.0 prototype for dependable STH diagnosis and furthering the development of automated digital microscopes in accordance with WHO guidelines for STH diagnosis.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Ancylostomatoidea / isolation & purification
  • Animals
  • Artificial Intelligence*
  • Ascaris lumbricoides* / isolation & purification
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Feces* / parasitology
  • Female
  • Helminthiasis* / diagnosis
  • Helminthiasis* / parasitology
  • Helminths / classification
  • Helminths / isolation & purification
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Microscopy / methods
  • Parasite Egg Count / methods
  • Peru
  • Prospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Soil* / parasitology
  • Trichuris / isolation & purification

Substances

  • Soil

Grants and funding

This work was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. The sponsor was responsible for the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.