Two-year clinical outcome of patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction: insights from the prospective KAMIR-NIH Registry

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 20:11:1458740. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1458740. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a crucial prognostic indicator of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there is a lack of studies on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF) after AMI.

Methods: We categorized 6,553 patients with AMI from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health (KAMIR-NIH) between November 2011 and December 2015 into three groups based on their EF, as assessed by echocardiography during index hospitalization: reduced EF (LVEF ≤40%), mildly reduced EF (LVEF 41%-49%), and preserved EF (LVEF ≥50%). The primary outcome was all-cause death within 2 years. The secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, any MI, or revascularization.

Results: Of the total 6,553 patients, 884 (13.5%) were classified into the reduced EF group, 1,749 (26.7%) into the mildly reduced EF group, and 3,920 (59.8%) into the preserved EF group. Patients with mildly reduced EF exhibited intermediate mortality (reduced EF, 24.7%; mildly reduced EF, 8.3%; preserved EF, 4.6%; p < 0.0001), MI (3.9% vs. 2.7% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.0046), and POCE (33.0% vs. 15.6% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.0001) rates, albeit closer to those of the preserved EF. After adjustment for demographics, risk factors, admission status, and discharge medications, patients with mildly reduced EF showed a lower risk of all-cause death than those with reduced EF (mildly reduced EF group as a reference: HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.40-2.18; p < 0.001), but it did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75-1.18; p = 0.999).

Conclusions: Over a 2-year follow-up period, patients with AMI and mildly reduced EF demonstrated better prognoses than those with reduced EF, but did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF.

Clinical trial registration: cris.nih.go.kr, identifier: KCT-0000863.

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; left ventricular ejection fraction; mildly reduced ejection fraction; prognosis; prospective registry.

Grants and funding

The authors declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by a grant (2016-ER6304-02) from the Research of the Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Electronic CRF development and data management for this study were performed using iCReaT (Internet-based Clinical Research and Trial management system), a data management system established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (iCReaT Study No. C110016).