Objective: To compare the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI), as well as bleaching efficacy (BE) in the maxillary and mandibular arches after in-office dental bleaching.
Materials and methods: 90 participants were randomly into two groups according to the arch (maxillary or mandibular) in which the patient will first receive a 35 % hydrogen peroxide gel (2 sessions; 1 × 30 min; 1 week apart). TS and GI were recorded immediately after, up to 1 h, 24 h and 48 h after bleaching, using the 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). BE was assessed before bleaching and 30 days after the end of the treatment (shade guide units [ΔSGU], CIELab [ΔEab], CIEDE2000 [ΔE00], and Whiteness Index for Dentistry [WID]). TS and GI were compared using McNemar's and paired t-test. BE were compared with Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (ΔSGU) and paired t-test (ΔEab, ΔE00, and WID) (α = 0.05).
Results: The risk and the intensity of TS was statistically higher for the mandibular arch (p < 0.003). The risk and intensity of GI did not differ between arches (p > 0.38). Both arches demonstrated significant BE (ΔSGU, ΔEab, ΔE00 and WID), without differences between them (p > 0.08).
Conclusions: In-office dental bleaching induces higher risk and the intensity of TS in the mandibular arch when compared to maxillary arch, without significant differences in gingival irritation, or bleaching efficacy.
Clinical relevance: Most patients experience tooth sensitivity regardless of the dental arch involved. However, when performing in-office dental bleaching, clinicians should consider that the mandibular arch is more likely to experience greater sensitivity compared to the maxillary arch.
Keywords: Clinical trial; Dental arch; Dentin sensitivity; Hydrogen peroxide; Tooth bleaching.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.