Analyzing the safety and efficacy of pipeline embolization device in pediatric aneurysms: insight from a mul-ticenter cohort and pooled analysis

Background: Pediatric patients with intracranial aneurysms face high risks of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhages. Despite its approval for adults aged 22 and above, the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED, Covidien/Medtronic, Irvine, California, USA) is being considered for younger patients due to its efficacy. This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of using PEDs in pediatric aneurysm treatment.

Methods: A retrospective study across 14 institutions identified 25 patients (age ≤ 18) treated with PED from November 2014 to October 2019. A literature review included all published pediatric aneurysm cases treated with PED from 2007 to 2023. Analyzed data included patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment, clinical outcomes, and complications.

Results: We analyzed 81 pediatric patients, including 25 from the multi-center registry and 56 from 38 relevant literature. In the entire cohort of 81 patients, mean age of the patients was 11.9 ± 4.0 years (ranged from 9 months to 18 years), with 58.0% males. Ruptured aneurysms were observed in 7 patients (8.6%), whereas 43 patients (53.1%) harbored large/giant aneurysms. The aneurysm occlusion rate was 87.7% during the median 7 months follow-up. Complications occurred in 12.3% of patients, resulting in morbidity in 5 cases (6.1%) and mortality in 4 cases (4.9%). Patient age was not associated with the occurrence of aneurysm residual, complications, and mortality following PED treatment.

Conclusions: PED can be effective for pediatric aneurysms, but morbidity and mortality can be substantial compared to the adults. Surgical timing should depend on clinical judgment and patient factors, without age-related delays.