A Comprehensive and Repeatable Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Quantification Approach for Clinical Evaluations of Tumor Blood Flow

Objective: The aim of this study is to define a comprehensive and repeatable contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging protocol and analysis method to quantitatively assess lesional blood flow. Easily repeatable CEUS evaluations are essential for longitudinal treatment monitoring. The quantification method described here aims to provide a structure for future clinical studies.

Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis study included liver CEUS studies in 80 patients, 40 of which contained lesions (primarily hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 28). Each patient was given at least 2 injections of a microbubble contrast agent, and 60-second continuous loops were acquired for each injection to enable evaluation of repeatability. For each bolus injection, 1.2 mL of contrast was delivered, whereas continuous, stationary scanning was performed. Automated respiratory gating and motion compensation algorithms dealt with breathing motion. Similar in size regions of interest were drawn around the lesion and liver parenchyma, and time-intensity curves (TICs) with linearized image data were generated. Four bolus transit parameters, rise time (RT), mean transit time (MTT), peak intensity (PI), and area under the curve (AUC), were extracted either directly from the actual TIC data or from a lognormal distribution curve fitted to the TIC. Interinjection repeatability for each parameter was evaluated with coefficient of variation. A 95% confidence interval was calculated for all fitted lognormal distribution curve coefficient of determination (R2) values, which serves as a data quality metric. One-sample t tests were performed between values obtained from injection pairs and between the fitted lognormal distribution curve and direct extraction from the TIC calculation methods to establish there were no significant differences between injections and measurement precision, respectively.

Results: Average interinjection coefficient of variation with both the fitted curve and direct calculation of RT and MTT was less than 21%, whereas PI and AUC were less than 40% for lesion and parenchyma regions of interest. The 95% confidence interval for the R2 value of all fitted lognormal curves was [0.95, 0.96]. The 1-sample t test for interinjection value difference showed no significant differences, indicating there was no relationship between the order of the repeated bolus injections and the resulting parameters. The 1-sample t test between the values from the fitted lognormal distribution curve and the direct extraction from the TIC calculation found no statistically significant differences (α = 0.05) for all perfusion-related parameters except lesion and parenchyma PI and lesion MTT.

Conclusions: The scanning protocol and analysis method outlined and validated in this study provide easily repeatable quantitative evaluations of lesional blood flow with bolus transit parameters in CEUS data that were not available before. With vital features such as probe stabilization ideally performed with an articulated arm and an automated respiratory gating algorithm, we were able to achieve interinjection repeatability of blood flow parameters that are comparable or surpass levels currently established for clinical 2D CEUS scans. Similar values and interinjection repeatability were achieved between calculations from a fitted curve or directly from the data. This demonstrated not only the strength of the protocol to generate TICs with minimal noise, but also suggests that curve fitting might be avoided for a more standardized approach. Utilizing the imaging protocol and analysis method defined in this study, we aim for this methodology to potentially assist clinicians to assess true perfusion changes for treatment monitoring with CEUS in longitudinal studies.