Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) is guideline-recommended in patients with cT2-T4N0M0 urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (UCUB). However, no population-based study validated the survival benefit of NAC recorded in clinical trials in a stage-specific fashion. We addressed this knowledge gap.
Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2007-2020), we identified patients with cT2-T4N0M0 UCUB treated with NAC before RC versus RC alone. Cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. Survival analyses were performed according to organ confined (OC: cT2N0M0) versus nonorgan confined stages (NOC: cT3-T4N0M0).
Results: Of 3,743 assessable patients, 1,020 (27%) underwent NAC versus 2,723 (73%) RC alone. NAC rates increased over time in OC stage (EAPC = 11.9%, P < 0.001) and NOC stage (EAPC = 8.6%, P < 0.001). In OC stage, cumulative incidence plots derived 5-year CSM was 15.6% in NAC and 19.9% in RC alone patients (P = 0.008). In multivariable CRR models, NAC independently predicted lower CSM (hazard ratio (HR): 0.74, P = 0.01). Similarly, in NOC stage, cumulative incidence plots derived 5-year CSM was 36.1% in NAC and 46.0% in RC alone patients (P = 0.01). In multivariable CRR models, NAC independently predicted lower CSM (HR: 0.66, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: NAC is associated with improved CSM compared to RC alone, both in OC and NOC stages. Specifically, the magnitude of the protective NAC effect was greater in NOC than OC patients. Thus, NAC should always be administered in all eligible patients before RC.
Keywords: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Nonorgan confined; Organ confined; Radical cystectomy; Urothelial carcinoma.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.