Centering Social Justice and Equity in Research on Accessibility to Public Buildings for Individuals with Mobility Disabilities: A scoping review

F1000Res. 2024 Oct 7:13:930. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.153797.2. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Purpose: To explore how principles of social justice and equity are integrated into research concerning accessibility to public buildings for individuals with mobility disabilities.

Methods: Utilising a scoping review methodology to assess literature based on the criteria set by the Joanna Briggs Institute, seven databases were screened. Studies were selected using the framework: "persons with mobility disabilities" AND "accessibility" AND "public buildings". A theoretical framework helped to extract codes and develop themes through an inductive-deductive analysis method. The results are presented descriptively.

Results: The examination of 84 studies uncovered a complex interplay between agencies, systemic challenges, discriminatory practices, and societal attitudes perpetuating marginalisation of individuals with mobility disabilities in their access to public buildings. The recommendations emphasize importance of practical measures, research imperatives, and policy developments to promote inclusivity. We present a 'Ten-step approach' to integrate social justice and equity into research on accessibility in public buildings for people with mobility disabilities.

Conclusion: Integrating diversity, active participation, and inclusive methodologies are essential to address systemic issues, discriminatory practices, and societal attitudes that hinder accessibility and inclusion. Collaborations with diverse stakeholders are crucial for policy changes, resource allocation, and advancing social justice and equity in accessibility research and practice.

Keywords: Capability Approach; agencies; de-discrimination; human rights; intersectionality; self-categorisation.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Architectural Accessibility*
  • Disabled Persons*
  • Humans
  • Social Justice*

Associated data

  • figshare/10.6084/m9.figshare.26143822

Grants and funding

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.