Exploring genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance in Brucella melitensis strains of human and animal origin from India

Front Microbiol. 2024 Oct 4:15:1474957. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1474957. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Brucella melitensis, the causative agent of brucellosis, is of growing concern, particularly in low and middle-income countries. This study aimed to explore the genetic basis of AMR in B. melitensis strains from India.

Methods: Twenty-four isolates from humans and animals were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing.

Results: Resistance to doxycycline (20.80%), ciprofloxacin (16.67%), cotrimoxazole (4.17%), and rifampicin (16.67%) was observed. Genome analysis revealed efflux-related genes like mprF, bepG, bepF, bepC, bepE, and bepD across all isolates, however, classical AMR genes were not detected. Mutations in key AMR-associated genes such as rpoB, gyrA, and folP were identified, intriguingly present in both resistant and susceptible isolates, suggesting a complex genotype-phenotype relationship in AMR among Brucella spp. Additionally, mutations in efflux genes were noted in resistant and some susceptible isolates, indicating their potential role in resistance mechanisms. However, mutations in AMR-associated genes did not consistently align with phenotypic resistance, suggesting a multifactorial basis for resistance.

Discussion: The study underscores the complexity of AMR in B. melitensis and advocates for a holistic multi-omics approach to fully understand resistance mechanisms. These findings offer valuable insights into genetic markers associated with AMR, guiding future research and treatment strategies.

Keywords: Brucella melitensis; antimicrobial susceptibility; brucellosis; efflux genes; single nucleotide polymorphism.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The study was conducted under the ICAR-funded AINP on One Health Approach to Zoonotic Diseases at the Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, India. This work was supported in part by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch/Multistate Project 1014385 and Xavier University, Aruba. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or decision to publish.