Evaluation of the Australian Triage Scale in patients who present to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Australas Emerg Care. 2024 Oct 21:S2588-994X(24)00059-9. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2024.10.001. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Evaluation of the Australian Triage Scale in patients who present to the emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED). Study aims were to evaluate the utility of the Australasian Triage Score (ATS) in patients presenting to the ED with UGIB.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 356 patients over a 2-year period who presented to a metropolitan hospital ED. The ATS was categorised into three groups, ATS 1/2, ATS 3 and ATS 4/5. Primary outcomes explored the relationship between ATS and haemodynamic parameters. Secondary outcomes evaluated the proportion of patients with suspected variceal bleeding and allocated a non-life-threatening ATS category.

Results: The study population were distributed by ATS 1/2 (28.7 %), ATS 3 (46.6 %) and ATS 4/5 (24.7 %). Over half of patients with some haemodynamic compromise were allocated an ATS 3 or 4/5. Additionally, 56 % with suspected variceal bleeding and 51 % with syncope were also allocated an ATS category (3 or 4/5).

Conclusions: The utility of the ATS recognises most patients presenting with UGIB at high-risk of adverse outcomes. Additional screening at triage maybe beneficial for those patients with a history of cirrhosis or varices, and UGIB-related syncope. Consideration of an ATS category of 2 for these patients may enable them to access earlier time-critical therapies.

Keywords: Emergency room visits; Hematemesis; Melena; Risk; Triage.