The triglyceride glucose: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio is associated with coronary artery calcification evaluated via non-gated chest CT

Background: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is a common risk factor of cardiovascular disease. Although triglyceride glucose (TYG) index and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) are both associated with CAC, no study has evaluated the correlation between the TYG/HDL-c ratio and CAC. In the present study, we investigated the relationships between CAC and the TYG index and the TYG/HDL-c ratio.

Methods: A total of 9585 participants who underwent computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer from 2018 to 2020 were included in this cross-sectional study. Demographic data, laboratory test data and medical history data were collected from medical records. TYG = Ln[fasting glucose (mg/dL)×fasting TG (mg/dL/2]. The triglyceride glucose-HDL-c ratio was calculated as TYG/HDL-c. CAC was evaluated on chest CT images. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and restricted cubic splines were used to determine the relationships among the TYG index, TYG/HDL-c ratio and risk of CAC. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of the TYG index and TYG/HDL-c ratio in identifying CACs in individuals aged 60 years and above.

Results: CAC was detected in 2515 of 9585 participants (mean age 51.8 ± 15.5 years, 61.2% men). The prevalence of CAC was significantly greater in participants with a high TYG/HDL-c ratio (32.6% in the fourth quartile vs. 19.1% in the first quartile, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that both the TYG index (odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.10) and the TYG/HDL-c ratio were associated with coronary artery calcification (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.14-1.51). No such association was observed between the TYG index and CAC when further adjusted for the serum lipid level (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.99-1.54). The TYG/HDL-c ratio was still associated with CAC after further adjustment for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09-1.35). TYG/HDL-c ratio was associated both with single vessel and multivessel calcification (OR = 1.14, 95%CI:1.05-1.23; OR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.05-1.21). Similar trends were observed when we categorized individuals by TYG index and TYG/HDL-c quartiles and in subjects older than 60 years. Restricted cubic splines revealed that the TYG/HDL ratio had a better dose‒responsive relationship than did the TYG index. Subgroup analysis revealed that the association between the TYG/HDL-c ratio and coronary artery calcification was mainly observed in nondiabetic or nonhypertensive participants, regardless of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The ROC curve also revealed that the TYG/HDL-c ratio was better able to identify CAC than the TYG index was (area under the curve = 0.54 vs. 0.52, p < 0.01) in subjects older than 60 years.

Conclusion: An increase in the TYG/HDL-c ratio is significantly positively associated with the risk of CAC, and the TYG/HDL-c ratio has a more stable association with CAC than TYG.