Acute mountain sickness occurs due to rapid altitude ascents and/or insufficient acclimatization. Acetazolamide (AZ) is commonly prescribed for AMS prophylaxis but inhibits exercise performance. Methazolamide (MZ), an analogous drug, has similar prophylactic benefits but does not impair isolated muscle mass exercise performance in normoxia. We sought to compare whole-body exercise performance in acute hypoxia (FIO2 = 0.15) between AZ, MZ and placebo (PLA). Fifteen healthy participants completed 5 testing visits: day 1 maximal exercise test, day 2 a familiarization, and days 3-5 were the experimental visits. Each experimental visit involved a 5-km hypoxic cycling time trial performed after a 2-day dosing protocol of either AZ (250 mg t.i.d.), MZ (100 mg b.i.d.) or PLA (t.i.d.); the order was randomized and double-blinded. Prior to exercise, capillary blood samples were taken, and maximal voluntary contractions of quadriceps were performed. AZ and MZ resulted in a partially compensated metabolic acidosis at rest compared to PLA (capillary H+ 47±3, 43±2, 39±2 nmol for AZ, MZ and PLA respectively, p<0.01). Time to complete 5-km with PLA (562±32 seconds, p<0.01) was significantly faster than AZ and MZ (577±38 vs. 581±37s respectively), with no differences between AZ and MZ (p=0.96). There were no differences in average ventilation (124±27, 127±24, 127±19 l/min) and oxyhemoglobin saturation (87±2, 88±2, 88±3%) between AZ, MZ and PLA respectively (p>0.05). Overall, both AZ and MZ impair whole-body exercise performance in acute normobaric hypoxia.
Keywords: acetazolamide; fatigue; methazolamide; time trial.