Relationship between sexual dysfunction and burnout among physicians in primary hospital: a cross-sectional study

Background: The relationship between sexual dysfunction and burnout among physicians remains unclear.

Aim: To investigate the frequency of sexual dysfunction among physicians in primary hospital and explore the association between sexual dysfunction and burnout.

Methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey conducted through a questionnaire. We used the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale and the Chinese version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Service Survey to assess sexual function and burnout among physicians in primary hospital. Considering the working environment of physicians, we also evaluated the doctor-patient relationship and sleep quality.

Outcomes: Over one-third of physicians experience sexual dysfunction. Burnout is a significant factor to sexual dysfunction among medical professionals.

Results: A total of 382 doctors participated in this survey, and the prevalence of sexual dysfunction was 33.51%. Sexual arousal and orgasm were the main sexual dysfunctions faced by male and female doctors, respectively. The prevalence of burnout among physicians was 43.72%. The prevalence of sexual dysfunction among physicians experiencing burnout (45.51%) was higher than that observed in physicians without burnout (24.19%). Physicians with burnout exhibited significantly higher total and individual scores on the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale as compared with physicians without burnout (all P values <.05). There was a significant positive correlation between depersonalization and sexual drive (r = 0.508, P < .001), sexual arousal (r = 0.521, P < .001), lubrication (r = 0.432, P < .001), orgasm/erection (r = 0.420, P < .001), and sexual satisfaction (r = 0.434, P < .001). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that-in addition to burnout-older age, dissatisfaction with income, a poor doctor-patient relationship, and poor sleep were significant contributors to sexual dysfunction among physicians in primary hospitals.

Clinical implications: Sexual health is an integral aspect of well-being. Prioritizing the sexual health of medical professionals can significantly contribute to improving their productivity.

Strengths and limitations: First, our sample size was small, and the impact of different specialties on sexual functioning was somewhat overlooked. Second, we lacked laboratory data (eg, testosterone and prolactin levels) that could provide substantial support to sexual identification. Finally, although we used logistic regression to establish causality, the relationship between sexual dysfunction and certain factors may be bidirectional.

Conclusions: The issue of sexual dysfunction among doctors needs more attention. We should make targeted efforts to improve the quality of physicians' sexual lives.