A cost-effective protocol for single-cell RNA sequencing of human skin

Front Immunol. 2024 Oct 30:15:1393017. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1393017. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) and flow cytometry studies in skin are methodologically complex and costly, limiting their accessibility to researchers worldwide. Ideally, RNA and protein-based analyses should be performed on the same lesion to obtain more comprehensive data. However, current protocols generally focus on either scRNAseq or flow cytometry of healthy skin.

Methods: We present a novel label-free sample multiplexing strategy, building on the souporcell algorithm, which enables scRNAseq analysis of paired blood and skin samples. Additionally, we provide detailed instructions for simultaneous flow cytometry analysis from the same sample, with necessary adaptations for both healthy and inflamed skin specimens.

Results: This tissue multiplexing strategy mitigates technical batch effects and reduces costs by 2-4 times compared to existing protocols. We also demonstrate the effects of varying enzymatic incubation durations (1, 3, and 16 hours, with and without enzyme P) on flow cytometry outcomes. Comprehensive explanations of bioinformatic demultiplexing steps and a detailed step-by-step protocol of the entire experimental procedure are included.

Discussion: The protocol outlined in this article will make scRNAseq and flow cytometry analysis of skin samples more accessible to researchers, especially those new to these techniques.

Keywords: flow cytometry; inflammation; multiplexing; single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA); skin; skin dissociation; souporcell.

MeSH terms

  • Computational Biology / methods
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Flow Cytometry* / economics
  • Flow Cytometry* / methods
  • Humans
  • Sequence Analysis, RNA / economics
  • Sequence Analysis, RNA / methods
  • Single-Cell Analysis* / economics
  • Single-Cell Analysis* / methods
  • Skin* / metabolism

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV, grant no: PPRC-2021-31), and the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK, grant no: 221S877).