Long-term outcomes comparison of Bentall-De Bono-versus valve-sparing aortic root replacement: An updated systematic review and reconstructed time-to-event meta-analysis

Int J Cardiol. 2025 Jan 15:419:132728. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132728. Epub 2024 Nov 16.

Abstract

Background: For patients with aortic root dilatation and a structurally normal aortic valve (AV) undergoing composite aortic valve-graft (Bentall-De Bono) versus valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) procedures there are conflicting data regarding early and long-term benefits. We undertook a study-level meta-analysis to compare the results of both procedures.

Methods: Three databases were assessed, and both randomized trials and observational studies were considered eligible. Kaplan-Meier curves of long-term survival and reoperation risk were reconstructed and compared with Cox linear regression and incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Landmark analysis and time-varying hazard ratio (HR) were analyzed. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for early mortality, postoperative stroke, and re-exploration for postoperative bleeding. A random effects model was used. Sensitivity analyses included leave-one-out-analysis, meta-regression and subgroups analysis.

Results: 1456 articles were identified, including 39 observational studies, totaling 14,651 patients (Bentall-De Bono = 9557 and VSARR = 5094). Twelve studies were adjusted. The mean weighted follow-up was 5.05 ± 3.7 years. VSARR was associated with significantly greater survival (HR = 0.50; 95 % CI, 0.45-0.57; p < 0.0001) at 15-year follow-up. The reoperation risk was higher following VSARR (HR = 1.30; 95 % CI, 1.03-1.63; p = 0.02.), although time-varying HR model and landmark analysis reported an increased risk of reoperation within 5 years after VSARR (HR = 1.57; 95 % CI, 1.23-2.01; p < 0.001), after which the difference disappeared. Subgroups analysis of studies excluding aortic dissection showed a comparable rate of late reoperation.

Conclusions: VSARR is associated with improved long-term survival compared to Bentall-De Bono. The risk of late reoperation is higher within 5 years following VSARR, after which the two procedures are comparable.

Keywords: Aortic root dilatation; Bentall-De Bono procedure; David procedure; Long-term outcomes; Meta-analysis; Valve-sparing aortic root replacement; Yacoub procedure.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Aortic Valve* / surgery
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / methods
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / methods
  • Humans
  • Observational Studies as Topic / methods
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / methods
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome