Background and objectives: Recent studies have demonstrated that early rhythm control for first-line treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) improved cardiovascular outcomes. However, there is limited data regarding the long-term outcome of patients who failed antiarrhythmic drugs and who refuse radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).
Methods: Patients with AF who were refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs and had refused further rhythm control attempts via RFCA were retrospectively identified and propensity-score (PS) matched with those who had been treated with RFCA. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality or ischemic stroke.
Results: A total of 169 patients who refused rhythm control with RFCA and PS matched 169 patients who had been treated with RFCA were included for analysis. During a mean follow-up of 4.3 (2.3;6.9) years, maintenance of sinus rhythm was more achieved in RFCA group (7 [4.1%] in Refuse group vs. 133 [78.7%] in RFCA group, p < 0.001). The incidence of ischemic stroke was significantly higher in patients who refused RFCA compared with patients who underwent RFCA (2.96 per 100 person-years in the Refused group vs. 0.74 per 100 person-years in the RFCA group, log-rank p < 0.001), but all-cause mortality was not significantly different (log-rank p = 0.8). Refusal of attempted rhythm control via RFCA was an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke on multivariate Cox analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-8.53, p = 0.02).
Conclusion: In patients with antiarrhythmic drug-refractory AF, the risk of stroke was significantly higher in patients who refused rhythm control via RFCA compared with that of those treated with RFCA.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; decision‐making; radiofrequency ablation; shared.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.