Objectives: This study aimed to assess the anatomical feasibility of a novel modular triple-branched endograft for aortic arch diseases.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 314 patients with aortic arch pathologies treated at a single center from January 2018 to December 2023. Preoperative computed tomography angiography images were analyzed with three-dimensional reconstruction to quantify anatomical features. Feasibility was based on endograft anatomical criteria, and logistic regression identified risk factors for unsuitability.
Results: Out of 132 patients included in the study, 67.4% were deemed anatomically suitable for the triple-branched device. A total of 36 (27.3%) patients were deemed inapplicable due to a large diameter of the proximal landing zone, 12 (9%) patients due to a small diameter of the left common carotid artery, and 1 (0.8%) patient due to a small diameter of the left subclavian artery. Logistic regression identified large proximal landing zone diameter and small left common carotid artery diameter were significant factors for unsuitability (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively).
Conclusions: The novel triple-branched endograft demonstrated promising anatomical feasibility in two-thirds of patients. However, anatomical constraints limited its applicability. Future device iterations should focus on accommodating a broader range of anatomical variations.
Keywords: Aortic arch disease; anatomical feasibility; branched endograft; endovascular aortic repair; off-the-shelf.