Feasibility study of a game-based virtual reality intervention for functional prosthesis use training: A preclinical assessment

Jing Mu; Ricardo Garcia-Rosas; Raphael Maria Mayer; Daniel Meise; Jim Lavranos; Mark Graf; Ying Tan; Denny Oetomo; Peter Choong

doi:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000390

Feasibility study of a game-based virtual reality intervention for functional prosthesis use training: A preclinical assessment

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Nov 22. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000390. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Jing Mu^{1

2

3}, Ricardo Garcia-Rosas^{1

3}, Raphael Maria Mayer^{1

3}, Daniel Meise⁴, Jim Lavranos⁵, Mark Graf⁶, Ying Tan¹, Denny Oetomo¹, Peter Choong⁷

Affiliations

¹ Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
² Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
³ Virtetic Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia.
⁴ Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
⁵ The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
⁶ Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
⁷ Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

PMID: 39589353
DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000390

Abstract

Objective: This paper presents a preclinical feasibility study to investigate the efficacy of a game-based virtual reality (VR) intervention in the functional training of upper-limb prosthesis use.

Methods: The study compared the skill of 2 able-bodied groups (intervention and control, 5 participants in each group) using a surface electromyography controlled self-experience prosthetic hand and wrist through the Box and Blocks Test (BBT). The Intervention Group followed the game-based VR intervention for 4 weeks and underwent real-life (RL) BBT assessments before and after the intervention using the self-experience prosthesis. The Control Group performed the RL BBT assessments 4 weeks apart with no VR intervention in between. As a follow-on study, the Control Group then underwent the VR intervention for further validation. The VR intervention consisted of 2 games designed to train the control and use of a surface electromyography-controlled prosthetic hand and an assessment (VR BBT). The VR intervention protocol included three 30-minute sessions per week over a period of 4 weeks.

Results: A significantly larger improvement was shown in the BBT scores from the Intervention Group (mean 6.375) compared to the Control Group (1.5). The follow-on study further confirmed the result.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated promising outcomes in the use of a game-based VR intervention for training functional prosthesis use, with participants showing significant improvements in prosthesis use skills measured with RL BBT. This motivates further development of VR interventions for prosthesis use training and their validation through clinical trials.