Three-dimensional digital imaging analysis of the palatal bone thickness for orthodontic mini-implant insertion - determination of the safe zone and angulation

BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1448. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05229-y.

Abstract

Background: In order to successfully perform orthodontic mini-implant procedures successfully for the subsequent anchoring of orthodontic appliances, it is crucial to know the palatal bone thickness. This is usually assessed using two-dimensional radiographs. The purpose of this study was to use a three-dimensional digital imaging measurement method to provide information on palatal bone volume and bone thickness and to make recommendations on the optimal and safe insertion site and angle for palatal mini-implants.

Methods: For this observational, cross-section study, pre-existing cone beam computed tomography scans of 184 patients were converted into 3D Standard Tessellation Language (STL) models of the maxilla. The area between the canine and the first molar was divided into 6 regions of interest (ROIs), three on the left side of the palate and three on the right side. The bone thickness of the palate was analyzed volumetrically and linearly while simulating different mini-implant insertion angles of 0°, 10°, 20° and 30° degrees relative to the palatal surface.

Results: Among the ROIs, the greatest mean bone thickness was observed in the region of the first premolars with a mean distance (MD) of 10.44 ± 2.53 mm and decreased from anterior to posterior (MD: 3.44 ± 1.16 mm). The highest volume (Vol) values were also measured in the anterior palatal region (Vol: 1127.26 ± 483.91 mm3), while there was also a decrease in the posterior region (Vol: 394.36 ± 180.22 mm3). Regarding the simulated palatal mini-implant insertion sites, the greatest bone thickness was found in the anterior region, at the level of the canines with an angle of 0° (MD: 12.25 ± 3.75 mm). In the more posterior region, at the level between the first and second premolars, the greatest bone thickness was observed at an angle of 30° (MD: 7.93 ± 3.81 mm). Gender differences were found.

Conclusion: This clinical study showed that the paramedian region at the level of the first premolar is the safest site for orthodontic mini-implant placement as evaluated by three-dimensional measurements. The results showed that implant insertion angle, gender and age are important aspects to consider when planning and inserting orthodontic palatal mini-implants.

Trial registration: N.a.

Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; Orthodontic anchorage procedures; Palate; Temporary anchorage devices; Three-dimensional.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cone-Beam Computed Tomography* / methods
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Dental Implants*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional* / methods
  • Male
  • Maxilla / anatomy & histology
  • Maxilla / diagnostic imaging
  • Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures* / instrumentation
  • Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures* / methods
  • Palate / anatomy & histology
  • Palate / diagnostic imaging
  • Palate, Hard / anatomy & histology
  • Palate, Hard / diagnostic imaging
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Dental Implants