Impact of clinician feedback reports on antibiotic use in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

Background: Feedback reports summarizing clinician performance are effective tools for improving antibiotic use in the ambulatory setting, but the effectiveness of feedback reports in the hospital setting is unknown.

Methods: Quasi-experimental study conducted between December 2021 and November 2023 within a pediatric health system measuring the impact of clinician feedback reports delivered by email and reviewed in a monthly meeting on appropriate antibiotic use in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We used an interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) to estimate the immediate change and change over time in the proportion of CAP encounters adherent to validated metrics of antibiotic choice and duration, then used Poisson regression to estimate intervention effect as a rate ratio (RR).

Results: Preintervention, 213 of 413 (52%) encounters received the appropriate antibiotic choice and duration, which increased to 308 of 387 (80%) postintervention. The ITSA demonstrated an immediate 18% increase in the proportion of CAP encounters receiving both the appropriate antibiotic choice and duration (95% confidence interval, 3-33%), with no further change over time (-0.3% per month, 95% CI -2-2%). In the Poisson model adjusted for age, sex, race, season, site, and intensive care unit admission, the intervention was associated with a 32% increase in the rate of appropriate antibiotic choice and duration (RR 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.56, P <0.01). No difference in length of stay or revisits were detected postintervention.

Conclusion: The intervention was associated with an increase in clinician adherence to antibiotic choice and duration recommendations for children hospitalized with CAP.