To date, sparse attention has been paid to the importance of the "lived experience" of participants and their caregivers in pediatric gene therapy (GT) trials for rare genetic neurological disorders. Pediatric GT studies differ meaningfully from adult GT studies as the decision to participate involves a dyad: the child participant and their caregiver(s). As a multistakeholder group of authors, we are a diverse group with expert perspectives on the social, emotional, physical, and logistical burdens/benefits of trial participation and the myriad ways they affect pediatric GT research. For both pragmatic and ethical reasons, it is essential to prioritize addressing child participant and adult caregiver needs and concerns when designing and conducting GT clinical trials in pediatric populations with rare genetic neurological disorders. We use the term "lived experience" in reference to how people think about and make decisions regarding participation in research studies and how they articulate the emotional, social, ethical, and equity tradeoffs that impact their lives and illness experience. In this article, we describe why accounting for child participants' and adult caregivers' lived experience and addressing pertinent equity issues are essential when designing and conducting pediatric GT trials for rare genetic neurological diseases.
Keywords: AAV; Clinical trial; Gene therapy; Lived experience; Pediatric; Rare genetic neurological disorder; Viral vector.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.