Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Targeted and Immune Combination Therapy in Advanced Melanoma-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Nov 28;25(23):12821. doi: 10.3390/ijms252312821.

Abstract

The combinations of BRAF inhibitor-based targeted therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors currently represent less common therapeutic approaches in advanced melanoma. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of currently available melanoma treatments by conducting a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Four databases were systematically searched for randomized clinical studies that included patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma receiving chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, or combinations thereof. The primary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), serious adverse events (SAE) of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, therapy discontinuation, progression-free survival (PFS), as well as objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR). A total of 63 articles were eligible for our systematic review; 59 of them were included in the statistical analysis. A separate subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy outcomes, specifically in BRAF-positive patients. Triple combination therapy or triple therapy (inhibiting BRAF, MEK and PD1/PDL1 axis) showed significantly longer progression-free survival compared to BRAF + MEK combination therapies (HR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.9), but similar objective and complete response rates in BRAF-mutated melanoma. This safety analysis suggests that triple therapy is not inferior to combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF/MEK therapies in terms of serious adverse events and therapy discontinuation rates. However, monotherapies and BRAF/MEK combinations showed notable advantage over triple therapy in terms of treatment-related adverse events. Combination strategies including BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies with ICI therapies are effective first-line options for advanced, BRAF-mutant melanoma; however, they are associated with more frequent side effects. Therefore, future RCTs are required to evaluate and identify high-risk subpopulations where triple therapy therapies should be considered.

Keywords: advanced melanoma; immune checkpoint inhibitor; network meta-analysis; targeted therapy; triple therapy.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors* / adverse effects
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors* / therapeutic use
  • Immunotherapy / methods
  • Melanoma* / drug therapy
  • Melanoma* / pathology
  • Molecular Targeted Therapy / adverse effects
  • Network Meta-Analysis*
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf* / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf* / genetics
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
  • BRAF protein, human
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Grants and funding

L.V.K. is a recipient of the János Bolyai Research Scholarship from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and is supported by the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (OTKA FK138696) grant. L.V.K. and the MTA-SE Lendület "Momentum” Dermatooncology Research Group are the recipients of the Lendület “Momentum” grant from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (LP2024-12/2024). This project was funded by grant agreement No. 739593 of the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation program.