Development of a new VMAT QA framework for Mobius3D using control-point specific EPID images

Front Oncol. 2024 Dec 4:14:1478118. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1478118. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Purpose: This study presents novel quality assurance (QA) approach for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) that leverages frame-by-frame electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images integrated into Mobius3D for accurate three-dimensional dose calculations.

Methods: Sequential EPID images for VMAT plans were acquired every 0.4-second by iView system and processed through iterative deconvolution to mitigate blurring from photon scattering. Deconvolved images were binarized to define multi-leaf collimator (MLC) positions. Pre-acquired box fluences determined optimal threshold for binarization and adjusted for detector shift depending on gantry and collimator angles. Sequential EPID images were re-scaled using pixel scaling factor (PSF) and converted to monitor unit (MU) proportional values. Generated EPID-based log file, including control-point specific MLC and monitor units (MU) information, were analyzed in Mobius3D for Gamma passing rate (GPR) of VMAT plans from 18 patients. Plan complexity indices were calculated and correlated with GPR.

Results: Clinically appropriate threshold was defined to be 20000 that can extract accurate MLC data from the deconvolved binarized EPID images. Positional deviations due to gantry and collimator rotations were observed to be up to 4.5 pixels. Recalibrated EPID pixel values showed linearity with MU regardless of changes in dose rate. Consequently, average GPR for 18 patients evaluated using Mobius3D reached 95.2% ± 3.7%%, based on 3% dose difference and 3mm distance-to-agreement criterion. It was found that two plan complexity indices showed statistically significant correlation with GPR.

Conclusion: This study successfully implemented novel measurement-based VMAT QA framework based on control-point specific EPID, based upon accurate MLC and MU data at each frame.

Keywords: EPID; VMAT QA; control-point specific QA; log-based QA; patient-specific QA.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Varian Medical Systems under a research framework agreement (4-2021-0869).