Tumor characteristics, treatments, and oncological outcomes of prostate cancer in men aged ≤60 years: real-world data from a single urological center over a 10-year period

Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):2408-2418. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-410. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) has emerged as one of the most common malignancies among men globally. However, its pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment responses in younger patients (aged 60 years or below) remain underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the distinctive clinical features, treatment strategies, and oncological outcomes of PCa in men aged 60 years or younger over a 10-year period at a single urological center.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, spanning January 2010 to June 2020. The study included patients aged ≤60 years who underwent prostate biopsies. We examined clinical characteristics, pathological findings, treatment approaches, and survival outcomes using t-tests and chi-square tests. Adjusted linear regression models evaluated the relationships between treatment modalities and outcomes, while Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression assessed progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Of the 5,686 patients who underwent prostate biopsy, 643 (11.3%) were ≤60 years old. Among these, 42.8% (275/643) were diagnosed with PCa, with 59.6% presenting at advanced stages. Compared to those with negative pathology, patients with PCa were older and more likely to have hypertension, alcohol consumption, and metabolic syndrome. Most patients (69.8%) received definitive local therapy, while 22.2% opted for palliative care and 8.0% were loss to follow-up. The median follow-up period for the entire cohort was 28.0 months and the median PFS was 77.0 months. For patients receiving definitive local therapy, the median CSS and OS were not reached, while those undergoing palliative therapy had median CSS and OS of 52.0 and 59.0 months, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, International Society of Urological Pathology >3, bone metastasis, and localized treatment as independent factors affecting PFS. Propensity score matching showed that definitive therapy led to superior PFS compared to palliative therapy for patients with localized PCa and a life expectancy of over 5 years.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the influence of incidence, diagnostic characteristics, and treatment methods in younger men with PCa, emphasizing the need to identify specific risk factors and treatment response patterns. Further large-scale, multi-center research is necessary to improve diagnosis and outcomes for PCa patients in this age group.

Keywords: Prostatic neoplasms; clinical characteristics; prognosis; survival; young.