What immunology has to say about pesticide safety

Front Immunol. 2024 Dec 9:15:1487805. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1487805. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The use of pesticides has enabled the development of contemporary industrial agriculture and significantly increased crop yields. However, they are also considered a source of environmental pollution and a potential hazard to human health. Despite national agencies and the scientific community analyzing pesticide safety, immunotoxicity assays are often not required, poorly designed, or underestimated. Epidemiological evidence indicates that pesticide exposure increases the risk of developing cancer. Therefore, pesticides may not only act as carcinogens per se but also as immunosuppressive agents that create a permissive context for tumor development. Given recent evidence demonstrating the critical role of the immune response in cancer progression, we will highlight the necessity of assessing the potential impacts of pesticides on the immune response, particularly on tumor immunosurveillance. In this Perspective article, we will focus on the need to critically review fundamental aspects of toxicological studies conducted on pesticides to provide a clearer understanding of the risks associated with exposure to these compounds to human health.

Keywords: anti-tumor immunity; cancer; immunosurveilance; immunotoxicity evaluation; pesticides - adverse effects.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Environmental Exposure / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms / immunology
  • Pesticides* / adverse effects
  • Pesticides* / toxicity

Substances

  • Pesticides

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from the National Agency for Promotion of Science and Technology from Argentina (ANPCYT) and the National Research Council of Argentina (CONICET) granted to Dr. Mercedes Fuertes and Dr. Norberto Zwirner. The funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication. We also thank Fundación Williams, Fundación Cherny and Fundación René Barón for providing additional support.