Source-specific soil heavy metal risk assessment in arsenic waste mine site of Yunnan: Integrating environmental and biological factors

J Hazard Mater. 2024 Dec 20:486:136902. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136902. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

This study quantified heavy metal (HM) pollution risks in mining site soils to provide targeted solutions for environmental remediation. Focusing on As waste mine sites in Yunnan, we utilised multiple indices and a positive matrix factorisation model to assess and quantify ecological health risks. Our ecological risk assessment distinguished between environmental and biological factors. This study demonstrated that As and Pb are the most impactful contaminants in environmental and biological contexts, respectively. Notably, the quantification of ecological risk sources indicated that agricultural sources were the main environmental influencers, accounting for 58.45 % of the total impact. Consequently, Cu from agricultural sources has become a primary environmental HM target, replacing As. In the quantification of health risk sources, mining and smelting activities predominantly contributed to health risks, contributing 23 % and 39.81 % of the Non-Carcinogenic Risk and 47.98 % and 42.96 % of the Carcinogenic Risk, respectively. The representative pollution source elements As and Cd were consistent with the health risk assessment results. This study refined the ecological risk assessment framework by distinguishing between environmental and biological factors, providing crucial insights into the rehabilitation of mine sites and formulation of effective environmental management strategies.

Keywords: Heavy metal; Mine soil; Risk assessment; Risk quantification; Source identification.