Noise Reduction in Brain CT: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction Using Multiple Parameters

Tomography. 2024 Dec 18;10(12):2073-2086. doi: 10.3390/tomography10120147.

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the noise reduction effects of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) in brain computed tomography (CT).

Methods: CT images of a 16 cm dosimetry phantom, a head phantom, and the brains of 11 patients were reconstructed using filtered backprojection (FBP) and various levels of DLR and HIR. The slice thickness was 5, 2.5, 1.25, and 0.625 mm. Phantom imaging was also conducted at various tube currents. The noise reduction ratio was calculated using FBP as the reference. For patient imaging, overall image quality was visually compared between DLR and HIR images that exhibited similar noise reduction ratios.

Results: The noise reduction ratio increased with increasing levels of DLR and HIR in phantom and patient imaging. For DLR, noise reduction was more pronounced with decreasing slice thickness, while such thickness dependence was less evident for HIR. Although the noise reduction effects of DLR were similar between the head phantom and patients, they differed for the dosimetry phantom. Variations between imaging objects were small for HIR. The noise reduction ratio was low at low tube currents for the dosimetry phantom using DLR; otherwise, the influence of the tube current was small. In terms of visual image quality, DLR outperformed HIR in 1.25 mm thick images but not in thicker images.

Conclusions: The degree of noise reduction using DLR depends on the slice thickness, tube current, and imaging object in addition to the level of DLR, which should be considered in the clinical use of DLR. DLR may be particularly beneficial for thin-slice imaging.

Keywords: brain; computed tomography; deep learning reconstruction; hybrid iterative reconstruction; image noise.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Brain* / diagnostic imaging
  • Deep Learning*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Phantoms, Imaging*
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Signal-To-Noise Ratio
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed* / methods

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.