Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Diagnosing Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancer Med. 2025 Jan;14(1):e70414. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70414.

Abstract

Background: Lymphoma arises from transformed lymphoid cells. Although surgical excision biopsy is the standard diagnostic tool for patients with lymphoma, image-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB) is considered an alternative diagnostic option.

Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients with lymphoma.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. A literature search was performed up to January 1, 2024, using the Ovid-MELIBE and EMBASE databases to identify studies focusing on US-guided CNB in lymphoma patients. Relevant outcomes, including sensitivity, specificity, and complication rates, were extracted from the included studies. The Der-Simonian-Laird random-effects model was applied to analyze the pooled data.

Results: The pooled sensitivity of US-guided CNB in lymphoma patients was 94% (95% CI = 89%-96%), and the specificity was 100% (95% CI = 94%-100%). The pooled complication rate was 1% (95% CI = 0%-3%), with self-limiting complications being the most common.

Conclusion: US-guided CNB demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and low complication rates in patients with lymphoma, supporting its use as an alternative diagnostic tool.

Keywords: core needle biopsy; lymphoma; meta‐analysis; systematic review; ultrasound.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Biopsy, Large-Core Needle / adverse effects
  • Biopsy, Large-Core Needle / methods
  • Humans
  • Image-Guided Biopsy* / adverse effects
  • Image-Guided Biopsy* / methods
  • Lymphoma* / diagnosis
  • Lymphoma* / diagnostic imaging
  • Lymphoma* / pathology
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional / methods