Polymeric Materials Used in 3DP in Dentistry-Biocompatibility Testing Challenges

Polymers (Basel). 2024 Dec 19;16(24):3550. doi: 10.3390/polym16243550.

Abstract

In the latter part of the 20th century, remarkable developments in new dental materials and technologies were achieved. However, regarding the impact of dental resin-based materials 3D-printed on cellular responses, there have been a limited number of published studies recently. The biocompatibility of dental restorative materials is a controversial topic, especially when discussing modern manufacturing technologies. Three-dimensional printing generates the release of residual monomers due to incomplete polymerization of materials and involves the use of potentially toxic substances in post-printing processes that cannot be completely eliminated. Considering the issue of biocompatibility, this article aims to establish an overview of this aspect, summarizing the different types of biocompatibility tests performed on materials used in 3D printing in dentistry. In order to create this comprehensive review, articles dealing with the issue of 3D printing in dentistry were analysed by accessing the main specialized search engines using specific keywords. Relevant data referring to types of materials used in 3DP to manufacture various dental devices, polymerization methods, factors affecting monomer release, cytotoxicity of unreacted products or post-curing treatments, and methods for assessing biocompatibility were analysed. Although the introduction of new restorative materials used in dental treatments is subject to national and international regulations and standards, it is necessary to investigate them regarding biocompatibility in order to support or deny the manufacturers' statements regarding this aspect.

Keywords: 3D printing in dentistry; biocompatibility of 3D-printed materials; biocompatibility tests; cytotoxicity; dental materials; polymers; residual monomers; temporary prosthetic restorations; viability.

Publication types

  • Review

Grants and funding

The publication of this paper was supported by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” through the institutional program “Publish not Perish”.