Objective: This study compared the effects of two different warm-up protocols (normal vs. priming) on the oxygen plateau ([Formula: see text]) incidence rate during a ramp test. It also compared the cardiopulmonary responses during the ramp test and subsequent verification phase.
Methods: Eleven recreational cyclists performed two experimental visits. The first visit required a normal warm-up (cycling at 50 W for 10 min) followed by the ramp test (30 W.min-1) and supramaximal verification phase with 30 min rest between tests. The second visit required a priming warm-up (cycling at 50 W for 4 min increasing to 70% difference between the gas exchange threshold [GET] and maximum work rate [WRmax] for 6 min) followed by the same protocol as in the first visit. Physiological responses were collected during the exercise and compared. Oxygen kinetics ([Formula: see text] Kinetics) and [Formula: see text] incidence rate were determined during the ramp tests for both visits.
Results: As planned, following the warm-up the priming visit experienced greater physiological response. However, the incidence rate of [Formula: see text] during the ramp test was the same between visits (73%), and maximal oxygen uptake was not different between visits after the ramp test (normal, 4.0 ± 0.8; primed, 4.0 ± 0.7 L·min-1, p = 0.230) and verification phase (normal, 3.8 ± 0.6; primed, 3.8 ± 0.7 L·min-1, p = 0.924) using a Holm-Bonferroni correction for controlling family-wise error rate. [Formula: see text] Kinetics were not different between visits during the ramp test (normal, 10.8 ± 1.1; primed, 10.8 ± 1.2 mL·min-1·W-1, p = 0.407). The verification phase confirmed [Formula: see text] in 100% for both the normal and priming visits.
Conclusion: Our hypothesis that a priming warm-up facilitates the incidence rate of [Formula: see text] during a ramp test is not supported by the results. The verification phase remains a prudent option when determining a 'true' [Formula: see text] is required.
Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.