Editorial Commentary: Failure to Return to Sport Following Latarjet May Be Due to Diverse Causes: Psychological Reasons Are Most Common

Arthroscopy. 2025 Jan 6:S0749-8063(25)00006-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.004. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

The Latarjet procedure is a successful treatment for anterior shoulder instability with less than 5% having redislocations - revision surgery and prior surgery having been shown to be significant risk factors for recurrence. Approximately 90% of athletes return to play after Latarjet, comparable to arthroscopic Bankart repair. Patients may be physically unable to return to play, which may be due to persistent pain, apprehension, or weakness. Pain may be common following the Latarjet procedure, and may be attributable to issues with hardware or graft placement, and may be best evaluated with CT scan. If screw fixation is not parallel to the joint and too posterior, then it may irritate the suprascapular nerve. Weakness due to nerve injury occurs in less than 1% of patients. Graft issues may be difficult to manage if due to non-union, mal-union, mal-positioning or graft fracture. All of these may also contribute to apprehension, as could incomplete rehabilitation or psychological reasons. Psychological reasons for not returning are the biggest contributor for athletes being unable to return to play following the Latarjet procedure and may be an area where improvements could be made in early screening and intervention. Improvements in the rehabilitation process could address psychological issues, and perhaps patients with kinesiophobia should be rehabbed differently from those with concerns over their ability to perform for other reasons, such as retirement from sport. Finally, it is important to report why athletes are not returning to sport.

Publication types

  • Editorial