Indications for tracheostomy placement in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy

Elizabeth Fisher; Taher Valika

doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112226

Indications for tracheostomy placement in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jan 7:189:112226. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112226. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Elizabeth Fisher¹, Taher Valika²

Affiliations

¹ Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
² Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Division of Otolaryngology, Chicago, IL, USA.

PMID: 39793295
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112226

Abstract

Background: Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common neuromuscular disorder in children, and children with CP are at increased risk of respiratory distress potentially requiring tracheostomy placement. Previous studies have characterized indications for tracheostomy in neurologically compromised children, however no studies focus specifically on children with CP. The purpose of this study was to identify the indications for tracheostomy placement, sites of airway obstruction, and rate of decannulation in children with CP.

Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of all patients who presented with cerebral palsy and required tracheostomy at our center between 2005 and 2023. Patients were categorized according to primary indication for tracheostomy placement. The most common sites of airway obstruction in the cohort were recorded. The date of decannulation was recorded for those patients who had undergone decannulation.

Results: 933 patients with tracheostomies were identified, of whom 169 (18 %) had CP and 122 met inclusion criteria. The median age at tracheostomy placement was 1.69 (IQR 0.539-6.609) years. The most common indications for tracheostomy placement were: prolonged intubation or BiPAP dependence (81 %), airway obstruction/hypotonia (13 %), and aspiration/recurrent respiratory infection (6 %). At the time of tracheostomy placement: 38 % of patients had a single site of upper airway obstruction, while 27 % had multi-level obstruction. The most common sites of upper airway obstruction were the supraglottis (23.0 %), tongue base (12 %), and the tonsils/pharyngeal wall (8 %). 24 % of patients had tracheobronchomalacia, and 16 % had subglottic stenosis. Among all patients, 4 of 122 (3 %) were ultimately decannulated.

Conclusions: Patients in our cohort most often received tracheostomy after failure of less invasive ventilation therapies. Tracheostomy placement occurred at a young age. Patients presented with a variety of sites of airway obstruction. Decannulation rate in this cohort was low. Further work is needed to confirm indications for tracheostomy placement and decannulation rate in this population.