Integrating Retinal Segmentation Metrics with Machine Learning for Predictions from Mouse SD-OCT Scans

Curr Eye Res. 2025 Jan 23:1-10. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2025.2456783. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to initially test whether machine learning approaches could categorically predict two simple biological features, mouse age and mouse species, using the retinal segmentation metrics.

Methods: The retinal layer thickness data obtained from C57BL/6 and DBA/2J mice were processed for machine learning after segmenting mouse retinal SD-OCT scans. Twenty-two models were trained to predict the mouse groups. The best neural network model was optimized for better outcomes. Prediction accuracy, the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F-1 score values were obtained.

Results: The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test provided significantly higher validation accuracy for neural networks than decision trees, discriminant analysis, support vector machines, and k-nearest neighbor classifiers (p = 0.005 for all). For C57BL/6-DBA/2J classification, a mean validation accuracy of 88.11 ± 3.92% (95% CI: 86.99-89.22) was achieved for the neural network when the optimized neural network had 92.31% final test accuracy with an area under the curve value of 0.9762, 94.44% sensitivity, 90.48% specificity, 89.47% precision, and 0.92 F-1 score. The optimized neural network model for age group differentiation had a final test accuracy of 82.05% with a 0.9064 area under the curve value, 77.27% sensitivity, 88.24% specificity, 89.47% precision, and 0.83 F-1 score.

Conclusions: These findings validate that machine learning, using segmentation metrics instead of images, can effectively analyze retinal OCT scans in mice for categorical predictions in experimental models. Expanding this approach with additional features, including histopathological and functional correlations, is expected to improve the prediction power further, promising valuable applications to predict more complex outcomes in experimental and clinical studies.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; machine learning; mouse; optical coherence tomography; retina.