A follow-up study of seasonal affective disorder

Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;167(3):380-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.167.3.380.

Abstract

Background: The long-term course of seasonal affective disorder has not been well studied.

Method: Using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, we interviewed 75% of a sample of 124 subjects diagnosed from five to eight years previously as fulfilling DSM-III-R criteria for recurrent major affective disorder, seasonal pattern.

Results: In the follow-up period, 38% of the sample continued to fulfil DSM-III-R criteria for seasonal illness; 28% had recurrent major depressive disorder, but no longer displayed a seasonal pattern; 18% were completely well with no further depression; 6% had subsyndromal symptoms; and 5%, although not meeting DSM-III-R criteria for seasonal illness, were still displaying constant periodicity. A short duration of index episode and a high frequency of illness predicted a continuing seasonal course of illness.

Conclusion: Diagnostic criteria for seasonal affective disorder need to be further refined, possibly restrictively, if they are to be used to predict the future course of seasonal illness.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Long-Term Care
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Care Team
  • Personality Assessment
  • Phototherapy
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • Recurrence
  • Seasonal Affective Disorder / classification
  • Seasonal Affective Disorder / diagnosis*
  • Seasonal Affective Disorder / psychology
  • Seasonal Affective Disorder / therapy
  • Treatment Outcome