Comparative evaluation of the haemodynamic effects of continuous negative external pressure (CNEP) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanically ventilated trauma patients

Intensive Care Med. 1995 Jan;21(1):67-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02425157.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the haemodynamic effects of identical values of continuous negative external pressure (CNEP) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in a group of mechanically ventilated patients.

Setting: General ICU, Vicenza Hospital, Italy.

Patients: 15 consecutive patients, admitted after road accident trauma.

Methods: We compared the haemodynamic effects of ZEEP, 10 cmH2O of PEEP, and 10 cmH2O CNEP, applied in random order, in 15 head trauma patients under going controlled mechanical ventilation; 9 had associated thoracic trauma, while 6 did not have lung involvement. CNEP was obtained with a "poncho".

Results: We observed a significant increase in CI during CNEP, compared with both ZEEP and PEEP 10 cmH2O. Accordingly the oxygen delivery index significantly increased during CNEP, compared with PEEP 10 cmH2O. Conversely, Qs/Qt decreased with CNEP, if compared with PEEP, both in patients with and without lung damage.

Conclusion: CNEP can significantly increase CI in mechanically ventilated patients in patients with and without associated lung damage.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Blood Gas Analysis
  • Craniocerebral Trauma / blood
  • Craniocerebral Trauma / physiopathology*
  • Craniocerebral Trauma / therapy
  • Hemodynamics / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Positive-Pressure Respiration*
  • Ventilators, Negative-Pressure*