The Dibie-Musset (DM) vena caval filter was evaluated on a hydraulic test bench reproducing flow conditions in the inferior vena cava: pressure, flow, viscosity, diameter and elasticity of the conduit. The results were compared with those obtained with the Greenfield filter (GF). In addition to classical measurements (captation and loss of load) we measured the velocity profile with a Doppler ultrasonic probe proximal and distal to the filter to study flow conditions before and after embolisation of clots. In order to circumvent the difficulties encountered with the use of real thrombi, chemical gels with visco-elastic properties, evaluated by viscosimetry, similar to those of blood clots, were used. Clots 45 mm long and 4 mm diameter were injected in several series of measurements. The DM filter was stable and did not migrate. In the horizontal position (flexible conduit) the DM filter was significantly more effective than the GF for less than 5 clots injected successively. The filtration capacity of both filters decreased with the number of clots captured. In the vertical position (rigid conduit), when there are less than 5 clots injected the two devices were perfectly effective. There was no significant difference between the two filters when 10 clots were injected. The loss of load resulting from the presence of the filter and clots was greater with the DM filter because of the greater captation capacity. However, the velocity profile distal to the filter was less disturbed with the DM filter because there was a more uniform distribution of the clots captured over the surface of the filter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)