Intravenous versus rectal prochlorperazine in the treatment of benign vascular or tension headache: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial

Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Nov;24(5):923-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(54)00222-3.

Abstract

Study objective: To compare the effectiveness of i.v. and PR prochlorperazine for treatment of acute benign vascular or tension headache.

Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

Setting: University emergency department with 50,000 annual census.

Participants: Forty-five adult patients enrolled on 46 visits.

Interventions: Patients received 10 mg prochlorperazine i.v. and placebo suppository or 25 mg prochlorperazine PR and placebo injection. Pain assessment was made using a 10-cm visual-analog scale; scores were analyzed using Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum tests (alpha of .01).

Results: Mean 60-minute pain scores for i.v. and PR groups were 0.6 and 3.5, respectively (P = .0002). Two patients (8.7%) in the i.v. group and six patients (26.1%) in the PR group required rescue analgesia (P = .12).

Conclusion: i.v. prochlorperazine appears to provide more effective relief than PR prochlorperazine for benign vascular or tension headaches.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Administration, Rectal
  • Adult
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intravenous
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain Measurement
  • Prochlorperazine / therapeutic use*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Tension-Type Headache / diagnosis
  • Tension-Type Headache / drug therapy*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vascular Headaches / diagnosis
  • Vascular Headaches / drug therapy*

Substances

  • Prochlorperazine