Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography

Radiology. 1994 Mar;190(3):803-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115630.

Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively compare conventional spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.

Materials and methods: Twenty women with clinically suspected adenomyosis underwent MR imaging and transvaginal sonography performed within 3 months of each other. Pathologic proof was obtained in all cases.

Results: Seventeen patients were proved to have adenomyosis. The correct diagnosis was achieved with MR imaging in 15 of 17 cases. One false-positive and two false-negative diagnoses were made with MR imaging. With transvaginal sonography, nine of 17 cases of adenomyosis were correctly diagnosed. One false-positive and eight false-negative diagnoses occurred. The most frequent cause of false-negative diagnoses with transvaginal sonography was the misinterpretation of adenomyosis as leiomyomas (seven cases).

Conclusion: MR imaging is significantly better (P < .02) than transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Endometriosis / diagnosis*
  • Endometriosis / diagnostic imaging
  • Endometriosis / epidemiology
  • False Negative Reactions
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Leiomyoma / diagnosis
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Prospective Studies
  • Ultrasonography
  • Uterine Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Uterine Diseases / diagnostic imaging
  • Uterine Diseases / epidemiology
  • Uterine Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Uterus / diagnostic imaging
  • Uterus / pathology*