High dose therapy with the resulting myeloablation rescued by infusion of autologous bone marrow (ABMT) has become a major treatment option for an increasing number of patients with hematologic and solid tumors. ABMT has several potential advantages over allogeneic transplantation. However, the major obstacle to the use of ABMT is that the infusion of occult tumor cells harbored within the harvested marrow would result in more rapid relapse of disease. To minimize the effects of the infusion of significant numbers of malignant cells, marrow for ABMT is obtained when the patient is either in complete remission or when there is no histologic evidence of bone marrow infiltration of disease. There is increasing evidence that minimal numbers of malignant cells can be detected within the remission marrow of these patients, particularly when assessed by sensitive clonogenic assays or polymerase chain reaction amplification. A variety of methods, pharmacologic and immunologic have been developed to "purge" malignant cells from the marrow. The aim of purging is to eliminate any contaminating malignant cells and leave intact the hematopoietic stem cells that are necessary for engraftment. Although the rationale for removing any contaminating cells from the autologous marrow appears compelling, the issue of purging remains highly controversial. Intense argument persists as to whether attempts to remove residual tumor cells from the harvested bone marrow have contributed to improving disease-free survival in these patients. To date there have been no clinical trials testing the efficacy of purging by comparison of infusion of purged versus unpurged autologous bone marrow. This is due primarily to the large number of patients that would be required for such studies.