Background: Inappropriate transfusion in cardiac surgery may, in part, be due to empiric transfusion therapy instituted in the absence of timely laboratory data. Therefore, the effect of a transfusion decision algorithm based on intraoperative coagulation monitoring of physicians' transfusion practice and the transfusion outcome was evaluated.
Study design and methods: In a randomized, controlled trial, cardiac surgical patients determined to have microvascular bleeding at the cessation of cardiopulmonary bypass were assigned to algorithm (A) or standard (S) therapy. Group A was treated with plasma and platelet therapy according to a transfusion algorithm based on on-site coagulation data available within 4 minutes. For Group S, the use of laboratory-based data and the decision to transfuse blood components were at physician discretion.
Results: Sixty-six patients were entered into the study (Group A, n = 30; Group S, n = 36). Other than the fact that there were significantly more female patients in Group S than in Group A, no differences between cohorts in regard to perioperative risk factors for blood transfusion needs were identified. Therefore, gender was factored in as a covariate in the statistical analysis. Group A patients received fewer hemostatic blood component units (p = 0.008) and had fewer total donor exposures (p = 0.007) during the entire hospitalization period. Linear regression analysis of the differences in slopes in Groups A and S for the relationships between the red cell volume lost and the red cell volume transfused (p < 0.03), non-red cell units transfused (p < 0.0001), and total number of blood components transfused (p < 0.0001) demonstrated that physicians' transfusion practice was significantly altered by the use of a transfusion algorithm with on-site coagulation data, independent of surgical blood losses.
Conclusion: The use of algorithms by transfusion decision makers can serve as an effective physician education intervention.