Comparative trial of large-particle aerosol and nose drop administration of live attenuated influenza vaccines

J Infect Dis. 1993 Nov;168(5):1282-5. doi: 10.1093/infdis/168.5.1282.

Abstract

Healthy adult subjects (n = 198) were randomized to receive bivalent cold-adapted (ca) influenza A vaccine containing 10(7.4) TCID50 each of A/Kawasaki/9/86 (H1N1) and A/Los Angeles/2/87 (H3N2) by either nose drops (ND) or large-particle aerosol (LPA). All subjects had received monovalent inactivated influenza B vaccine intramuscularly in the previous year. Ninety percent of LPA recipients and 82% of ND recipients preferred intranasal administration to their previous experience with intramuscular vaccine. Twenty-six (27%) of 98 LPA recipients and 47 (49%) of 97 ND recipients reported swallowing vaccine (P = .008). Fever was observed uncommonly (< or = 5%), and incidence of respiratory symptoms was comparable between groups. Fourfold or greater hemagglutination antibody response to at least one of the influenza A vaccine viruses was significantly more frequent after LPA (64%) than ND vaccination (43%; P = .005). LPA administration of ca influenza to the nasopharynx was well tolerated, safe, and more immunogenic than ND delivery.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Intranasal
  • Adult
  • Aerosols
  • Antibodies, Viral / blood
  • Humans
  • Influenza A virus / immunology*
  • Influenza Vaccines / administration & dosage*
  • Influenza Vaccines / therapeutic use
  • Influenza, Human / prevention & control*
  • Middle Aged
  • Vaccines, Attenuated / administration & dosage*
  • Vaccines, Attenuated / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Aerosols
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Influenza Vaccines
  • Vaccines, Attenuated