Iodixanol in intra-arterial cerebral digital subtraction angiography: a comparison with iohexol

Neuroradiology. 1995 Oct;37(7):512-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00593706.

Abstract

We randomised 86 patients undergoing intra-arterial cerebral digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) to receive iodixanol (Visipaque; Nycomed, Oslo, Norway) 150 mgI/ml or iohexol (Omnipaque; Nycomed) 140 mgI/ml. The efficacy and safety of these two contrast media were compared: efficacy by evaluating the diagnostic information and radiographic density yielded by the angiograms, safety by recording all discomfort connected with the injections, and all adverse events up to 24 h after the investigation. Diagnostic information was optimal in all patients and the overall radiographic density optimal in all but one (iohexol) (P = 0.49). A feeling of warmth, the only discomfort reported, was experienced by 43% and 54% of patients receiving iodixanol and iohexol, respectively (P = 0.26). Two patients in the iodixanol group and five in the iohexol group reported one adverse event (nausea, dizziness, visual disturbance or paraesthesiae) (P = 0.30); all were of mild severity except for one moderate adverse event in each group. Iodixanol 150 mgI/ml and iohexol 140 mgI/ml were demonstrated to be suitable for IADSA, with no clinically or statistically significant differences in efficacy, discomfort or adverse events.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Angiography, Digital Subtraction*
  • Cerebral Angiography*
  • Contrast Media* / adverse effects
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Iohexol* / adverse effects
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement
  • Triiodobenzoic Acids* / adverse effects

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Triiodobenzoic Acids
  • Iohexol
  • iodixanol