[Reliability of the estimate of post-voiding bladder volume with ultrasound. Comparison of 2 ultrasonography methods]

Arch Esp Urol. 1996 Jan-Feb;49(1):35-40.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the reliability of the postvoiding volume measurement of two US methods.

Methods: A comparative study of transabdominal and portable ultrasound (Bladderscan model) in the selected and non-selected modes was conducted in 96 patients (54 males, 42 females; mean age 59.92 yrs).

Results: Conventional US had the lowest failure rate (26.99%). The failure rate was 41.66% for the selected mode and 57.77% for the non-selected mode. The main failure of transabdominal ultrasound was a defect failure. The non-selected mode had a defect and excess failure. The selected mode had a defect failure. There was and inverse relationship between the residual volume and the failure rate of the non-selected mode of the Bladderscan model. The failure rate was higher for males vs females in the non-selected mode. The possible sources of failure are analyzed.

Conclusion: Conventional transabdominal ultrasound is currently the most reliable ultrasound method.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Ultrasonography
  • Urinary Bladder / diagnostic imaging*
  • Urinary Bladder / pathology
  • Urinary Bladder / physiopathology
  • Urination