Objective: To compare the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transvaginal ultrasound (TV-US) with that of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in detecting uterine abnormalities caused by in utero diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure.
Study design: The study was a prospective MRI and TV-US blind comparison of DES-exposed and nonexposed subjects who had had previous HSG for infertility evaluation.
Results: MRI identified uterine constrictions in 60% of patients and T-shaped uteri in 25% of DES-exposed patients with HSG-confirmed abnormalities. TV-US did not identify uterine constrictions or T-shaped uteri in DES-exposed patients.
Conclusion: HSG must still be considered the preferred method in evaluating DES-related uterine abnormalities. HSG-defined uterine abnormalities associated with in utero DES exposure were variably identified by MRI and not at all by TV-US.