Portal vein evaluation with US: comparison to angiography combined with CT arterial portography

Radiology. 1996 Oct;201(1):149-54. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816536.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare ultrasound (US) to angiography combined with computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP) in the preoperative evaluation of the portal vein.

Materials and methods: Sixty-three consecutive patients being considered for hepatic resection underwent color and spectral Doppler US and angiography with CTAP before surgery. The main, right, and left portal veins were evaluated separately. A total of 187 veins were assessed for encasement, occlusion, or thrombosis.

Results: At surgery, 41 portal veins were abnormal. US allowed detection of 38 of 41 (93%) involved portal veins with 93% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 97% positive predictive value, and 98% negative predictive value. Angiography with CTAP allowed diagnosis of 37 of 41 (90%) involved portal veins with 90% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 95% positive predictive value, and 97% negative predictive value.

Conclusion: US is comparable to angiography combined with CTAP in evaluation of the portal vein.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Constriction, Pathologic / diagnostic imaging
  • Female
  • Hepatectomy
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Portal Vein / diagnostic imaging*
  • Portography / methods
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Preoperative Care
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Thrombosis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods
  • Ultrasonography, Doppler*