[Skull injury in childhood: comparison of ultrasonography with conventional X-rays and computerized tomography]

Rofo. 1996 Oct;165(4):353-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015768.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to compare the value of ultrasound, conventional x-ray diagnosis and CT in detecting skull fractures and intracranial haemorrhage in children suffering from a head injury.

Material and methods: We examined 210 children who had a head injury. In all cases the calvarium was investigated by ultrasound using a 7.0 MHz linear transducer. In children with an open fontanel (n = 190) the cerebrum was screened additionally by ultrasound following a standard protocol. The sonographic findings were correlated to the x-ray examination (n = 21) and CT (n = 13).

Results: Ultrasound enabled diagnosis of linear calvarial fractures (n = 29), depressed fractures (n = 6) and intracranial haemorrhage (n = 8). X-Ray and CT examination confirmed the diagnosis of linear calvarial fractures in 16 cases, of depressed fractures in 6 cases. CT confirmed the sonographic diagnosis of intracranial haemorrhage in 8 cases.

Conclusion: Ultrasound as a primary method can replace the conventional x-ray in detecting calvarial fracture and posttraumatic sequelae. Additional CT examination depends on the sonographic and neurological status.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Cerebral Hemorrhage / diagnostic imaging*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Hematoma, Epidural, Cranial / diagnostic imaging
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Male
  • Skull Fractures / diagnostic imaging*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*
  • Ultrasonography