Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: experience with the initial 30 cases

J Urol. 1997 Feb;157(2):459-62. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65170-x.

Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the intermediate effectiveness of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.

Materials and methods: A total of 30 pyeloplasties was performed for symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction (24 primary and 6 secondary cases). Two separate types of reconstruction were performed, that is dismembered (26 patients) and Y-V (4) pyeloplasty. All patients were followed with excretory urography or diuretic renography. Moreover, factors affecting the learning curve (surgical technique, prior laparoscopic experience and cause of obstruction) were evaluated.

Results: A lower pole segmental renal vessel was found at the ureteropelvic junction in 18 patients (60%). Operative time ranged from 2.25 to 8.0 hours (mean 4.5). Postoperative morbidity (mean narcotic requirement 37.3 mg. morphine sulfate, mean hospital stay 3.5 days and convalescence 3 weeks) was minimum. At radiographic followup (mean 16.3 months, range 4 to 73) 97% of the patients demonstrated a patent ureteropelvic junction and resolution of or substantial decrease in hydronephrosis.

Conclusions: In the hands of an experienced laparoscopist, outcomes indicate that laparoscopic pyeloplasty shows success similar to that of open pyeloplasty but longer term outcomes must be assessed.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Kidney Pelvis / surgery*
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Male
  • Ureteral Obstruction / surgery*